To the Lord General Cromwell

Now I’d abhor the suggestion of any party political bias here at Sweettenorbull, so with the last four posts having come from the Cavalier camp, it’s about time a Parliamentarian poet got a look in.

The party political angle, by the way, isn’t as much of a joke as it sounds. The senior party in Britain’s current coalition government is the Conservative party, more commonly known as the Tories. The word Tory comes from the Gaelic ‘toraidhe’ – raiders, a name given to dispossessed Irish Catholics, nominally Royalists, who would harass Parliamentarian forces and protestant settlers (or ‘planters’) in Ireland. The junior party, the Liberal Democrats, can trace their origins back to the Liberals, who for most of their existence were known as the Whigs. The word ‘Whig’, from a Scots word meaning to spur on a horse, first took on a political meaning after the ‘Whiggamore raids’,  revolts in Southern Scotland against Scottish Covenanters’ support for Charles I in the second English Civil War. Britain’s other major political party, Labour, was founded in the 20th Century, although – at a stretch – one could trace the first stirrings of organized left-wing politics to the Civil war too, though I can’t see ‘the Levellers’ taking off as a nickname for the Labour Party, not least because of lingering memories of the 90s indie band of the same name.

But I digress. This post’s poem is a sonnet by one of the greatest names of the English literary canon to one of the commanding figures of British history.

To the Lord General Cromwell

Cromwell, our chief of men, who through a cloud,
Not of war only, but detractions rude,
Guided by faith and matchless fortitude,
To peace and truth thy glorious way hast ploughed,
And on the neck of crownèd Fortune proud
Hast reared God’s trophies, and His work pursued,
While Darwen stream, with blood of Scots imbrued,
And Dunbar field, resounds thy praises loud,
And Worchester’s laureate wreath: yet much remains
To conquer still; peace hath her victories
No less renowned than war: new foes arise,
Threatening to bind our souls with secular chains.
Help us to save free conscience from the paw
Of hireling wolves, whose gospel is their maw.
 

The poem, written in 1952 at the dawn of the Protectorate, starts by listing some of Cromwell’s achievements so far, not least his defeat of the Scots – rather his defeats of the Scots. The Scottish covenanters fought in the first English civil war on the side of parliament, but changed sides later on when it became clear that the Presbyterian faction in the Roundheads were losing out to the more radical independents – who had little sympathy with the covenanter’s aim of establishing Presbyterian church government across Britain. Milton’s poem ‘On the New Forcers of Conscience under the Long Parliament’ is of this anti-Presbyterian tendency, mocking the idea of replacing one system of tyrannical (from Milton’s point of view) church government with another, and cocking a snook at ‘Scotch what-d’ye call’s into the bargain. After switching sides, the Scots never won a battle against Cromwell’s new model army, losing decisively at Preston (‘Darwen stream’), Dunbar and Worcester. Milton, who makes a kind of holy warrior of Cromwell, sees this as God’s work being done. Cromwell thought much the same thing himself, though he was fairly conciliatory with the Scottish once he had subdued them, not meting out the kind of dreadful punishment the Catholic Irish were subject to. 

Milton’s main concern is religious freedom, which he sees is under threat from many new foes. He ends the poem with a plea to Cromwell to keep up the battle for religious freedom. The ‘hireling wolves’ he refers to could be the foreign troops that Charles II hoped could help him retake his throne, such as the German and Danish mercenaries that Montrose took into the North of Scotland (see last post), or the paid clergy of the Anglican establishment. Unfortunately for Milton, Cromwell didn’t live long enough to do all the godly work he could have, and Charles II came back with a vengeance – though Milton, at fellow poet Andrew Marvell’s intercession, was spared his share of the bloodletting.

Advertisements

4 Comments

Filed under History, Poetry

4 responses to “To the Lord General Cromwell

  1. Very enlightening. Recall visiting the Cromwell Museum years ago while stationed in the U.K.

  2. Thanks. I’ve never been to the museum, though I’ll drop in if I’m ever in that neck of the woods. He was a fearsome man- though his actions – especially in Ireland – make one shudder, I can see why Milton felt him worthy of a laudatory poem.

  3. Strictly speaking, the Irish conflict was at least a three-way one or even four-way: Irish Catholic rebels against English rule, strong in the north; Irish (some of English origin, some Catholic and some Protestant) supporters of rule by the English crown (therefore Royalists but also opposed to the rebels); and the few Irish supporters of Parliament, all Protestants, but including Scottish settlers in the north (who could be considered a fourth group). All these groups except the rebels led by the O’Neills received reinforcement from England or Scotland, most powerfully the Parliamentarians, but the struggle continued to be confused by these different allegiances. For example, when Cromwell slaughtered the garrison of Drogheda, he was kiliing Royalists not rebels, and yet some Irish royalists threw in their lot with Cromwell rather than with the rebels. The word rebel here implies no judgement on their cause. But it may be interesting to note that into recent years the IRA signed public communications “P. O’Neill”, a reference to the leader of the uprising.

  4. Interesting side note, Simon. Most of my knowledge of the Civil War comes from Trevor Royle’s ‘Civil War: The War’s of the Three Kingdoms 1638-1660’. The title is pointed – he means to say that this isn’t just an ‘English Civil War’, but a series of conflicts involving all the peoples of the British Isles. I would certainly recommend it and he is especially good on Scottish affairs.
    His Ireland sections were decent, but reading them I felt like I didn’t quite know enough about the pre-existing situation in Ireland to get the most out of them.
    I have been trying to make up for that since, intermittently reading the comprehensive, but somewhat dry ‘The Making of Ireland’ by James Lydon. What I’d really like though is a book that captures the imagination about Irish History in the same way that, say, Peter Ackroyd’s books do with English history. Any recommendations?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s